Picasso and Columbus: What Do They Have In Common?

Pablo Picasso and Christopher Columbus -- two household names in all four corners of the world.

One is a twentieth-century Spanish artist whose painting, La Guernica, stands as a universal condemnation of war atrocities. The other an Italian explorer, credited for discovering the New World in 1492.

Discussing these two men here seems to do justice to neither one of them. What would Picasso, widely admired for his artistic talents, have anything to do with Columbus, a controversial figure lauded or despised for his actions?

Despite their differences, these two European men share something in common: Their hubris, that is, their conviction that what they did represented humanity, and their neglect of people that do not belong to the same race.

Prominently featured in Picasso's painting La Guernica is the killing of innocent women and children in wars. Despair, suffering, and death fill the gray, black, and white canvas, which shows a screaming woman in front of a house on fire, another one holding a dead child, and a dismembered soldier lying under a squealing horse. 


La Guernica is Picasso's political statement against the two-hour Nazi Germany's bombardment of a small Basque town, Guernica and the deaths of more than 2,500 civilians during the Spanish civil war. Commissioned by the Spanish Republicans (Franco's adversaries), the work was exhibited at the 1937 International Exposition in Paris, went on a world tour, and returned to Spain in 1981 after 42 years of loan to the Museum of Modern Art in New York. 

During the Vietnam war in the 1960s and 1970s, the painting gained more fame as antiwar activists put it on posters to denounce U.S. colonial war and the 1968 massacre at My Lai, where 500 villagers, including women and infants, were slaughtered by the U.S. army. Cementing its iconic antiwar status, the United Nations headquarters in New York displayed a tapestry depicting Picasso's La Guernica from 1986 to 2021.

Granted, La Guernica is a powerful symbol of the tragedies of war. The killing of innocent civilians in Guernica was barbarous. Incensed at the nonsensical massacre of Spaniards in his lifetime, Picasso created a masterpiece mural.

The problem is that Picasso's La Guernica is about crimes committed against his countrymen, rather than crimes committed by his country against the Indigenous peoples in the New World.

Here enters Christopher Columbus, a hero in western civilization, the "great" explorer who spearheaded the European invasions of the New World.

The Columbus Monument, Barcelona, Spain

After setting foot on the Hispaniola island (nowadays known as Haiti and the Dominican Republic), Columbus carried a large-scale genocide against the Arawak Indians. Financed by the Spanish monarchy, he ravaged the island, enslaving the Indians, sending 500 of them to Spain in 1495, and forcing the rest to work in gold mines. 

Appointed governor and viceroy of the Indies, Columbus slaughtered the natives. To deter further rebellion, he had their dismembered bodies paraded through the streets. According to the record, three million natives perished from war, slavery, and mines.

The insatiable appetite for gold led Columbus and his men on a rampage, murdering, raping, enslaving, and pillaging wherever they went. In a few years, through violence and slavery, Columbus annihilated the natives of the Caribbean islands.

Columbus's heinous crimes against humanity were amplified by other Spaniards at an even larger scale. Hernan Cortes decimated the Aztecs of Mexico. Francisco Pizarro obliterated the Incas of Peru.

Firmly anchored in a Eurocentric view of the world, both Picasso and Columbus never gave a thought to what Spain did to the Indigenous peoples of the New World.

After learning the destruction of Guernica, Picasso might have thought, "How the hell could Nazi Germany kill my own people so brazenly?" 

After seeing gold worn by the natives, Columbus's might have thought, "Bringing back all the gold to Spain will make Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand happy!"

How can we compare a two-hour bombardment of Guernica and a toll of 2,500 with the genocide of millions of American natives and the destruction of entire civilizations at a continental scale?

To show the violence perpetrated by white men against the Indigenous peoples of the New World, we need to replace La Guernica with a mural painting called La Hispaniola.

-----------------------------------------------

Read these other articles:

Enough with Moral Imperialism

Democracy and Human Chattel

The Democracy Trap: Ballot Box vs. Industrialization


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Russia-Ukraine War Benefits the World

Image
  Let’s call it what it is: The Russia-Ukraine conflict is a war between two imperialist powers, the US and Russia. The longer the war lasts, the better for the world, as the protracted war undermines their respective power. Is the conflict a clash between democracy and autocracy, as the US claims? Or is it self-defense against Western encroachment, as Russia contends? There is nothing righteous about the geopolitical tussle over which side will control Ukraine. Under the veneer of democratic freedom or pan-slavic nationalism lies the primacy of might by any means necessary. Any rational person with some knowledge of history and geopolitics should be able to cut through the smoke screens that each belligerent uses to justify its aggresion. When America brandishes its Democracy stick, it means that its empire itches for new boundaries. When the Russian Bear plays the victim, it merely pursues its centuries-old insatiable hunger for more land. Ten years on, the clash of titans has result
Read more

Why Has China Not Gone To War Yet?

Image
  Year after year, the US cries wolf about China’s impending military aggression. The familiar refrain from the White House, Congress, Pentagon, CIA, and retired generals comes in invariably alarming tone: China’s invasion of Taiwan is imminent; President Xi Jinping has ordered his military to be ready for invading Taiwan by a certain year; and rising tensions in the South China Sea will trigger WWIII. Year after year, the wolf fails to show up. Yet, the US Empire’s mass media keeps amplifying this false narrative, day in day out. These tired tropes never die. For good reasons. They vilify China as America’s greatest enemy. They advance the National Security Council’s bellicose agenda. They prompt Congress to boost ever greater defense budgets. They serve to rally American allies. The sweeping China military threat narrative brushes aside a major question: Why has China not gone to war yet, despite enjoying 40 years of dizzying economic boom and rapid military modernization? The U
Read more

China Must Bulk Up Its Nuclear Arsenal

Image
  Not a day goes by without the US raising the specter of China as an existential threat. Joining the fray, the Pentagon issued an alarming report in 2023 over China's faster expansion of its nuclear arsenal, which, it claimed, went from 400 warheads in 2022 to 500 in May 2023 and is projected to reach 1,500 by 2035.   This is great news. China's so-called "sharp" development of nuclear weapons is overdue. A stronger nuclear stance will deter adversaries from blackmailing and launching nuclear strikes.  To America, China's "rapid" nuclear modernization threatens the nuclear balance and poses as an "existential challenge" to its security. Upon reviewing the Pentagon report, Congress members declared that the Chinese buildup is a wake-up call to speed up the overhaul of US nuclear forces. The White House urged the Chinese government to come to the negotation table in the hope of striking a deal over arms control. The numbers bely the American cla
Read more